← Search

Colette van de Graaff

Eagle, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 74W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Colette van de Graaff to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history122 matches
L
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ryan van de Graaff mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-02 · Net Chix 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lori Layne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-04 · Net Chix 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Cowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-02 · Net Chix 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Christina Floyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-05-28 · Net Chix 55 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kimberly Cowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-05-14 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Heather Baird
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-04-21 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Sturdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-04-16 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Sturdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-04-09 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelly Sturdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-07 · Servivors · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimberly Cowley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
72.7%
16W–6L · 59.5% of games
4.0
53.1%
26W–23L · 52.7% of games
7.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 61% of games
8.0
69.6%
16W–7L · 60.9% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.3% of games
8.0mixed
30.8%
4W–9L · 44.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
57 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
14 matches
#1 Singles
8%
10 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal