← Search

Eric Hallingstad

Meridian, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
192 matches · 155W–37L · seasons 2022–2026

Captains: add Eric Hallingstad to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history192 matches
W
2026-09-09 · WTF 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Bartich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · WTF 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Trujillo-Dunn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-31 · WTF 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Connie Bartich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-26 · WTF 2026 · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lisa Trujillo-Dunn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Anna Orrison championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Rachel Kincheloe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Newby championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Rachel Kincheloe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-12 · WTF 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Paula Lawson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Jacob Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Simon Blundell / Andrew Cavallino
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Jacob Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
Raymond Jacobsohn / Andrew Baker
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Jacob Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
87.8%
43W–6L · 64.7% of games
4.0
66.7%
14W–7L · 58.3% of games
7.0mixed
78%
32W–9L · 60.9% of games
7.5mixed
78.6%
11W–3L · 55.4% of games
8.0mixed
80%
12W–3L · 67.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
86 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
53 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
31 matches
#1 Singles
9%
17 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova