← Search

Anna Orrison

Caldwell, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
390 matches · 242W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Anna Orrison to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history390 matches
W
2026-09-02 · Mixed Signals · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Jennifer Small / Andrew Kim
2026-08-19 · Mixed Signals · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-17 · Mixed Signals · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Scott Stewart mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-08-16 · #3 Doubles · with Eric Hallingstad championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Mixed Signals · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Caleb Roope mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Deniz Aygen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Shelley Ware championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Shelley Ware championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Kerri Porritt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Kerri Porritt championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jon Hancock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-07-19 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zel Mertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
72.9%
78W–29L · 57.9% of games
4.0
34.8%
23W–43L · 44% of games
7.0
75%
9W–3L · 64.3% of games
8.0
50%
4W–4L · 51.4% of games
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 51.5% of games
7.0mixed
72.3%
47W–18L · 60% of games
7.5mixed
63.2%
24W–14L · 56.3% of games
8.0mixed
65.5%
19W–10L · 56.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
144 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
121 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
114 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
1%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert