← Search

Jenny Grunke

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
317 matches · 169W–148L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jenny Grunke to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history317 matches
W
2026-09-09 · TennisIsMyJam · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Lynne Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-09-03 · Forever Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-02 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andy Mehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-09-01 · Forever Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-28 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Sauder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-26 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Andy Mehl mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-25 · Forever Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Suzanne Thomas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-12 · No Strings Attached · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Warwick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-11 · Forever Smashed · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosa Carnot
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-05 · TennisIsMyJam · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mary Lynne Schilling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Ginger Cummins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
W
Jackie Fuller / Tamara Gardner
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Ginger Cummins championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
4.0
53.9%
62W–53L · 53.4% of games
4.5
35%
7W–13L · 43.6% of games
7.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.3% of games
8.0
74.1%
40W–14L · 58.1% of games
9.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
55.1%
27W–22L · 53.1% of games
8.0mixed
23.7%
9W–29L · 42.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 52% of the time
#1 Doubles
52%
164 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
94 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
59 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal