← Search

Tamara Gardner

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 66W–69L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tamara Gardner to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Jackie Fuller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Jackie Fuller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
Heidi Dillard / Marion Cuthbertson
2026-06-17 · Howell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-15 · Howell · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tera Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-02 · Grand Slammers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-01 · Howell · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-05-21 · Grand Slammers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sue Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-05-24 · schenk 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Sayer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2025-05-09 · schenk 7.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Collette Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-05-06 · schenk 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2025-04-29 · schenk 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2025-04-28 · schenk 7.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jackie Fuller
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
69.6%
32W–14L · 57.2% of games
4.0
20%
3W–12L · 34.4% of games
7.0
59.4%
19W–13L · 53.9% of games
8.0
20%
2W–8L · 36.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 40% of the time
#2 Doubles
40%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
42 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal