← Search

Lisa Wheeler

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
331 matches · 163W–168L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lisa Wheeler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history331 matches
L
2026-08-17 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-05 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-29 · Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karri Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-28 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Linda Zentner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-27 · Wheeler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karri Sloan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-22 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jacqualyn Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-21 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Margo Nef
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · Wheeler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Di Bona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-15 · Wheeler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-09 · Forty and Fabulous · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
Elise Shurtliff / Linda Orchard
2026-07-09 · Wheeler · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level14 levels played
0.0
56.5%
13W–10L · 55.1% of games
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
61.5%
8W–5L · 57.6% of games
3.5
56.2%
41W–32L · 52.5% of games
4.0
13.3%
4W–26L · 33.3% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 59.2% of games
7.0
62.5%
15W–9L · 57% of games
8.0
18.2%
2W–9L · 36.5% of games
0.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 50% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 63.3% of games
6.5mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 59% of games
7.0mixed
50%
22W–22L · 50.2% of games
7.5mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37.6% of games
8.0mixed
30%
3W–7L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
121 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
114 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
74 matches
#1 Singles
5%
17 matches
#2 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams