← Search

Jessica Bare

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
522 matches · 305W–217L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jessica Bare to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history522 matches
L
2026-09-08 · TeAm BiGElOw · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Van Stosich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-09-02 · The Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Douglas Weber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-09-01 · TeAm BiGElOw · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holger Nickel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-31 · The Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Douglas Weber mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
Mark Taylor / Tina Taylor
2026-08-26 · The Volley Llamas · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cory Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-08-25 · TeAm BiGElOw · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holger Nickel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-19 · The Volley Llamas · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Cory Robertson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-17 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lisa Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
Lucy Anderson / Kathryn Hilton
2026-08-12 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-11 · Net Assets · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Collette Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Forty and Fabulous · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heidi Dillard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-05 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Linda Zentner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams78 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
71.4%
10W–4L · 56% of games
2.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
69.1%
65W–29L · 58.1% of games
3.5
40.6%
26W–38L · 46.9% of games
4.0
0%
0W–10L · 36.9% of games
2.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 58.5% of games
5.5mixed
65.2%
15W–8L · 59.4% of games
6.0mixed
69.2%
63W–28L · 58.6% of games
6.5mixed
60.5%
23W–15L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
67.9%
38W–18L · 53.3% of games
7.5mixed
50%
5W–5L · 50% of games
8.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 34.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
173 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
157 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
143 matches
#1 Singles
6%
33 matches
#2 Singles
3%
15 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal