← Search

Suzanne Meikle

Ammon, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
229 matches · 128W–101L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Suzanne Meikle to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history229 matches
L
Jessica Bare / Douglas Weber
2026-09-02 · Thompson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Meikle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
W
Mark Taylor / Tina Taylor
2026-08-31 · Thompson · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Meikle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-26 · Thompson · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Meikle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-08-24 · Thompson · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Ryan Meikle mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 2.5 · with Jenny Fullmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-13 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Fullmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-29 · Thompreemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lindsey Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-07-28 · Get A Grip · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-23 · Kunz · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Teresa Beebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-21 · Get A Grip · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-20 · Thompreemann · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with NICOLE SPENCE
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Thompreemann · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Beebe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 68.8% of games
3.5
70%
42W–18L · 59.1% of games
4.0
34%
18W–35L · 43.3% of games
6.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 56.3% of games
7.0mixed
59.5%
25W–17L · 52.2% of games
7.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 48.2% of games
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 28% of the time
#3 Doubles
28%
63 matches
#1 Singles
24%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
36 matches
#2 Singles
14%
32 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert