← Search

Deborah Stosich

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 78W–81L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Deborah Stosich to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-08-27 · TeAm BiGElOw · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Holger Nickel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-25 · TeAm BiGElOw · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Van Stosich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Hulse 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Rohe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-20 · Hulse 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Hulse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-19 · Hulse 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Rhonda Rohe
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-18 · TeAm BiGElOw · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Van Stosich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · Hulse 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa Henderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-27 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kamarie Hearne
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-23 · Hulse 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eli Griffin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Gyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · Hulse 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lois Slater
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-07-15 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alissa Marodis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
11.1%
1W–8L · 43.2% of games
4.0
41.4%
12W–17L · 49% of games
6.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
84.6%
22W–4L · 69.2% of games
8.0
45.7%
16W–19L · 49.6% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 59.2% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 45.6% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
54 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
50 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe