← Search

Deborah Stosich

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
152 matches · 72W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.38
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
93%
stay 3.5
7%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.33. Lower than today’s 3.38 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 3.5
25 of 46
ID · 3.5
165 of 289
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Deborah is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Deborah has played at 4.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.03.54.0201920202021202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Deborah has gone from the 71st to the 1st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level10 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–4L · 46.4% of games
4.0
41.4%
12W–17L · 49% of games
4.5
20%
1W–4L · 40.6% of games
6.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
83.3%
20W–4L · 68.1% of games
8.0
45.7%
16W–19L · 49.6% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 45.6% of games
7.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 41.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history152 matches
L
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kamarie Hearne
+0.005about as expected — took 37% of games against 38% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Eli Griffin
+0.006better than expected — took 92% of games against 75% expected
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Holly Gyles
+0.017about as expected — took 33% of games against 32% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lois Slater
−0.019below expectation — took 42% of games against 51% expected
7-5, 7-5
L
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alissa Marodis
−0.025below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karri Sloan
−0.050below expectation — took 14% of games against 43% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Karri Sloan
−0.002below expectation — took 25% of games against 33% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-18 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Margo Nef
+0.030better than expected — took 71% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Cindy McRoberts / Kelly Wathne
2026-06-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tresa Mason
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Angie Anderson / Michelle Sayer
2026-06-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jackie Fuller
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lynne Blatter
−0.037below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lurline Berry
−0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.