← Search

Holger Nickel

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
56 matches · 34W–22L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Holger Nickel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history56 matches
W
2026-09-01 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Bare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Deborah Stosich mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-25 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jessica Bare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-12 · Wilson & Gordon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ray Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with John Stosich championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-28 · Wilson & Gordon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-07-23 · Wilson & Gordon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · Wilson & Gordon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Kim Bryan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Kim Bryan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-12 · #2 Doubles · with Kim Bryan championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-26 · Morris Hall · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Thomas Gwinn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.5
80%
4W–1L · 82% of games
6.0
63.6%
14W–8L · 55.9% of games
7.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 64.4% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
25 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
12 matches
#2 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams