← Search

Susan Hulse

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
447 matches · 276W–171L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Susan Hulse to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history447 matches
L
2026-09-08 · Hulse's Heroes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zachary Hulse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-01 · Hulse's Heroes · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zachary Hulse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-08-27 · Hulse's Heroes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zachary Hulse mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-08-20 · Hulse 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Stosich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-19 · Hulse 6.0 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Linda Hawley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-19 · Hulse 6.0 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kathy Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-16 · #2 Doubles · with Joe Belnap championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Joe Belnap championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Joe Belnap championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Joe Belnap championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Joe Belnap championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-03 · Hulse 6.0 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathy Lloyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams77 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 58.6% of games
3.0
70.2%
40W–17L · 61.2% of games
3.5
32.7%
17W–35L · 44.8% of games
6.0
75.8%
25W–8L · 57.6% of games
7.0
62.2%
23W–14L · 57.5% of games
0.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
92%
23W–2L · 72.2% of games
6.0mixed
74.3%
52W–18L · 59.8% of games
6.5mixed
61.5%
24W–15L · 56.2% of games
7.0mixed
68.3%
28W–13L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
153 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
144 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
142 matches
#2 Singles
1%
4 matches
#1 Singles
0%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
0%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer