Teams

Hulse 6.0

2026 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER-IDAHO FALLS · Women 6.0 - 65 & Over

7 players · average NTRP 2.93 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-08-20vs Barbara BakerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKathy Lloyd / Linda Hawley vs Aimee Rathburn / Barbara Baker0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesDeborah Stosich / Rhonda Rohe vs Marie Parkinson / Irene Rindfleisch4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2026-08-20vs Barbara BakerWon 20
W#1 DoublesKathy Lloyd / Robbie Spicer vs Aimee Rathburn / Laura Ingram6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Hulse / Deborah Stosich vs Kimberly Wilson / Melanie Pratt6-1, 6-0
2026-08-19vs Barbara BakerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesSusan Hulse / Kathy Lloyd vs Barbara Baker / Kathy Gwinn6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesEli Griffin / Lois Slater vs Venita Petti / Melanie Pratt1-6, 1-6
2026-08-19vs Barbara BakerLost 03
L#1 DoublesRhonda Rohe / Deborah Stosich vs Kathy Gwinn / Venita Petti7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLois Slater / Eli Griffin vs Aimee Rathburn / Lori Head1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Hawley / Susan Hulse vs Melanie Pratt / Marie Parkinson0-6, 2-6
2026-08-03vs Barbara BakerWon 20
W#1 DoublesTeresa Henderson / Deborah Stosich vs Aimee Rathburn / Marie Parkinson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Hulse / Kathy Lloyd vs Venita Petti / Irene Rindfleisch6-1, 7-5
2026-07-28vs Barbara BakerWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobbie Spicer / Susan Hulse vs Marie Parkinson / Irene Rindfleisch6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesEli Griffin / Kathy Lloyd vs Barbara Baker / Aimee Rathburn3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2026-07-23vs Barbara BakerWon 10
W#2 DoublesDeborah Stosich / Eli Griffin vs Marie Parkinson / Melanie Pratt6-1, 6-0
2026-07-20vs Barbara BakerLost 12
L#1 DoublesDeborah Stosich / Lois Slater vs Kathy Gwinn / Marie Parkinson5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesSusan Hulse / Kathy Lloyd vs Aimee Rathburn / Irene Rindfleisch5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLinda Hawley / Eli Griffin vs Melanie Pratt / Barbara Baker4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 6.0 - 65 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Barbara Baker1021232
2Hulse 6.00112539

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.70 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.48
Deborah Stosich
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Susan Hulse
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.03
Eli Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.69
Rhonda Rohe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.64
Kathy Lloyd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.02
Linda Hawley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.92
Lois Slater
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Hulse + Kathy Lloyd6163% games+5.1% vs expected
Deborah Stosich + Eli Griffin4259% gamesnot enough data
Deborah Stosich + Kathy Lloyd123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Hulse + Eli Griffin213 matchesnot enough data
Linda Hawley + Kathy Lloyd033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Deborah Stosich
78W–81L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%56%44%
3.48
3
Susan Hulse
276W–169L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Eli Griffin
60W–59L career · 5 lines in 2026
42%58%<1%
3.03
2.5
Rhonda Rohe
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
3
Kathy Lloyd
41W–71L career · 6 lines in 2026
16%83%<1%
2.64
2.5
Linda Hawley
20W–110L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
2.5
Lois Slater
1W–18L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.