← Search

Rachel Mattson

Arimo, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 147W–76L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Rachel Mattson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Harmon · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Brake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-08-26 · Harmon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Brake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-24 · Harmon · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Brake mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Joshua Ellis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Jon Stoner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Joshua Ellis championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Jon Stoner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-08-14 · #3 Doubles · with Jon Stoner championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-11 · Wendy Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lyndsi Whitworth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-03 · Wendy Ellison · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Aspin Rhoades
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-07-27 · Wendy Elison · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Wendy Elison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Lyndsi Whitworth championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
71.2%
57W–23L · 59.9% of games
4.0
47.4%
9W–10L · 52.1% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
25%
1W–3L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
78.3%
18W–5L · 61.9% of games
7.5mixed
82.4%
14W–3L · 60.8% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 51.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
103 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
55 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams