← Search

Amy Cunningham

Pocatello, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
170 matches · 48W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Cunningham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history170 matches
L
2026-07-27 · Petti/ Lindley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robbie Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-22 · Petti/ Lindley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Surmelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-06 · Petti/ Lindley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · Petti/ Lindley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Surmelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-23 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michele Surmelis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-22 · Karen McGee · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Grasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-16 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-06-15 · Karen McGee · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robbie Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · Simply Smashing · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carrie Rose Lindley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-20 · Karen McGee · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Grasso
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-19 · Simply Smashing · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patricia Bolinger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-11 · Karen McGee · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robbie Spicer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
25%
1W–3L · 38% of games
3.5
39.2%
20W–31L · 45.3% of games
4.0
12.5%
1W–7L · 34% of games
7.0
37%
10W–17L · 45.4% of games
6.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 42% of games
7.0mixed
23.5%
12W–39L · 39.2% of games
7.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 33.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
51 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
46 matches
#1 Singles
4%
6 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal