← Search

Diane Poole

BLACKFOOT, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
359 matches · 192W–167L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Diane Poole to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history359 matches
W
2026-09-08 · SPLIT STEP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neil Marion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · SPLIT STEP · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neil Marion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-19 · Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Kuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · SPLIT STEP · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Neil Marion mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Neil Marion championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Neil Marion championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Neil Marion championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-08-12 · Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Kuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-08-11 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Anita Gibson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 3-6
W
2026-08-10 · Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Monica Kuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Anita Gibson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Anita Gibson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams86 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
63%
80W–47L · 57.7% of games
3.5
33.3%
32W–64L · 42.6% of games
6.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 64.1% of games
7.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 52.1% of games
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
71.4%
20W–8L · 58% of games
6.5mixed
35%
7W–13L · 47.1% of games
7.0mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
120 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
110 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
93 matches
#2 Singles
3%
11 matches
#4 Doubles
3%
10 matches
#1 Singles
2%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer