← Search

Ashley Bryngelson

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
238 matches · 149W–89L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Ashley Bryngelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history238 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Team Awesome · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chadd Cripe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-09-01 · Team Awesome · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Matthew Rubio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-27 · Team Awesome · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chadd Cripe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-08-20 · Team Awesome · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chadd Cripe mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Scott Stewart championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Patrik Martinet championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
L
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Stephen Heath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Tony Auston championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
L
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Stephen Heath championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-14 · #1 Doubles · with Caleb Roope championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-08-11 · Team Awesome · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Stephen Heath mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
73.8%
48W–17L · 61.3% of games
3.5
52.9%
27W–24L · 48.8% of games
4.0
42.9%
3W–4L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
71.9%
23W–9L · 63.7% of games
6.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 57% of games
7.0mixed
61.3%
19W–12L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 36% of the time
#1 Singles
36%
85 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
53 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
40 matches
#2 Singles
6%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams