← Search

Chadd Cripe

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
281 matches · 183W–98L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Chadd Cripe to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history281 matches
W
2026-09-08 · Team Awesome · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Bryngelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-28 · WTF 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chelsey Melby mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-27 · Team Awesome · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Bryngelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-25 · Team Awesome · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Coree Carver mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
W
2026-08-20 · Team Awesome · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ashley Bryngelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-18 · Team Awesome · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Monica Hubbard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chrissy Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristina Kingery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Chrissy Rose mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-07-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katie Nelson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-07-01 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shyam Anantharaman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · CHAK DE BOISE STARS · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kumar Yeddula
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 71.5% of games
3.5
67.8%
59W–28L · 57% of games
4.0
45.8%
11W–13L · 46.9% of games
6.0mixed
75%
12W–4L · 59.2% of games
6.5mixed
59.5%
22W–15L · 55% of games
7.0mixed
71.4%
35W–14L · 57.3% of games
7.5mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 51.4% of games
8.0mixed
81.8%
9W–2L · 64.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 27% of the time
#1 Doubles
27%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
54 matches
#1 Singles
19%
52 matches
#2 Singles
12%
34 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams