← Search

Amy Hanson

Eagle, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 107W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Hanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Strung Out 7.5 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-08-31 · Strung Out 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-26 · Strung Out 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-08-17 · Strung Out 7.5 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Joshua Cramer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Taylor Reynolds / Kylie Sumpter
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Kristina Kingery championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Kristina Kingery championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Sam Steiner / Miranda Tilley
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Kristina Kingery championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jake Putnam mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Davin Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Riley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Mallory championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michael Davin Hanson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
69.2%
27W–12L · 61.6% of games
3.5
74.4%
29W–10L · 55% of games
4.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 43.8% of games
6.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.8% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 58% of games
6.5mixed
65.4%
17W–9L · 55.1% of games
7.0mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 54.1% of games
7.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
61 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
50 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams