← Search

Jake Putnam

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
82 matches · 44W–38L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jake Putnam to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history82 matches
L
2026-09-09 · Buds Potential-65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-02 · Buds Potential-65 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-01 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dave Keim
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-27 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Moorhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-08-25 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phil Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-24 · Buds Potential-65 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Goslovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-18 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phil Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-17 · Buds Potential-65 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jay Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
W
David Koerner / Daniel Reed
2026-08-13 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phil Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-08-12 · Buds Potential-65 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joseph Brennan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-7
W
2026-08-06 · Bangers 65 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Phil Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Buds Potential-65 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Bruce Goslovich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
54.5%
6W–5L · 53.2% of games
4.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 65.3% of games
8.0
45%
9W–11L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
50%
7W–7L · 47.9% of games
7.5mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 51.8% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 40.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 49% of the time
#1 Doubles
49%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
14 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe