← Search

Jim Brigham

Meridian, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
279 matches · 195W–84L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Brigham to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history279 matches
W
2026-08-31 · WTF 2026 · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelley Canning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-12 · WTF 2026 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kelley Canning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Willie Lafrades championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with John Chavez championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Old Enough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Bidou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-06-23 · Old Faulters · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Andrew Bidou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-14 · #1 Doubles · with Jane Perlaky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-06-14 · #2 Doubles · with Jane Perlaky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Jane Perlaky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · with Jane Perlaky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-06-09 · Old Faulters · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeff Huhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-06-04 · Old Enough · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tim Cowles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
73.3%
55W–20L · 58.7% of games
4.0
54.5%
6W–5L · 51% of games
7.0
93%
40W–3L · 64.6% of games
8.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 45.8% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 52.4% of games
7.0mixed
81%
17W–4L · 64.7% of games
7.5mixed
93.8%
15W–1L · 63.9% of games
8.0mixed
60%
9W–6L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
104 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
97 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
78 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert