← Search

John Chavez

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
283 matches · 181W–102L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Chavez to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history283 matches
W
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Jim Brigham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-01 · Old Enough · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mark Stillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-17 · Old Enough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with James Mertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-08 · Old Enough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Russell Moorhead
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-04 · Old Enough · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Troy Casper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-11 · Xmen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Brigham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-20 · Xmen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dit Dudley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 2-6
W
2026-04-13 · Xmen · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Brigham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-04-08 · Xmen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Brigham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-04-04 · Xmen · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jim Brigham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-10-03 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Mitchell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-17 · Tap Dat Ace · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jennifer Mitchell mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams37 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
72.7%
56W–21L · 58.8% of games
4.0
40%
4W–6L · 46.5% of games
7.0
81.5%
22W–5L · 66.5% of games
7.0mixed
74.1%
20W–7L · 60.4% of games
7.5mixed
70.6%
24W–10L · 57.4% of games
8.0mixed
39.6%
19W–29L · 50.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
135 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
80 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
63 matches
#1 Singles
2%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer