← Search

Dit Dudley

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
266 matches · 159W–107L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Dit Dudley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history266 matches
W
2026-08-09 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jennifer Small mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-04 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Mallory mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Mark Stillman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kristina Kingery mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-06-30 · Old Faulters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · Miller Time · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joshua Harbst
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-24 · Old Enough · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · Chuck Norris · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nate Espinola
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-6
L
2026-06-18 · Chuck Norris · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Eric Forte
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · Old Faulters · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steven Garcia
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-09 · Chuck Norris · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Stillman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-08 · Old Enough · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Haycock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams45 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
61%
50W–32L · 55.4% of games
4.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 44.6% of games
7.0
90.9%
20W–2L · 68.3% of games
8.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 45.6% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 56.9% of games
7.0mixed
58.6%
34W–24L · 56.6% of games
7.5mixed
76.9%
10W–3L · 57.4% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
87 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
84 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
82 matches
#1 Singles
5%
12 matches
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova