Search

John Stosich

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
309 matches · 165W–144L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.43
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
80%
stay 3.5
20%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 95% stay · 5% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.37. Lower than today’s 3.43 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 3.5
6 of 6
ID · 3.5
88 of 115

John is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

John has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, John has gone from the 27th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level12 levels played
0.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 64.5% of games
3.5
66.7%
46W–23L · 54.7% of games
4.0
0%
0W–7L · 32.8% of games
4.5
100%
4W–0L · 59.2% of games
6.0
47.1%
8W–9L · 46.8% of games
7.0
81%
17W–4L · 64.2% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48.4% of games
6.5mixed
57.1%
16W–12L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
44.8%
13W–16L · 47.8% of games
7.5mixed
56.7%
17W–13L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
60%
27W–18L · 54.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history309 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Holger Nickel
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Colby Adams
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
W
LEIF TAPANILA / Mark Lynn
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ryan Daw
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
DJ Calderwood / Patrick Trimp
2026-07-23 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Boozer Jr
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
LEIF TAPANILA / Bill Fullmer
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joshua Berry
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 3-6, 1-0
W
Shawn Oram / LEIF TAPANILA
2026-07-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daniel Peterson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
Shawn Oram / Steve Warner
2026-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Curtis Godfrey
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 7-6
W
Ray Gordon / Walt Wood
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Boozer Jr
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 2-1
L
Mark Peterson / Mark Taylor
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Boozer Jr
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
W
Bill Fullmer / Howard Hansen
2026-06-23 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jim Migel
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
L
Mark Hinkson / Andrew Hinkson
2026-06-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tim Ross
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
W
Michael Shurtliff / Noah Goldman
2026-05-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jordan Simpson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.