← Search

Max Taylor

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
190 matches · 62W–128L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Max Taylor to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history190 matches
L
2026-08-12 · Wilson & Gordon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with DJ Calderwood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-08-06 · Wilson & Gordon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ray Gordon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-29 · Trent Fowers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Ryan Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-07-23 · Wilson & Gordon · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-21 · Wilson & Gordon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Mark Peterson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-13 · Trent Fowers · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brad Vande Kamp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-07-07 · Trent Fowers · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Skyleur Steffensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-05-26 · Old School Spin* · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Von Crofts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-21 · Old School Spin* · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James DiSanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2025-08-28 · Old Racketeers · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Charles Hunter
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2025-08-07 · Old Racketeers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Blaine Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-07-29 · Old Racketeers · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Walt Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
40.6%
13W–19L · 43.6% of games
3.5
30.6%
11W–25L · 39.6% of games
6.0
32%
8W–17L · 45.3% of games
7.0
15.8%
3W–16L · 36.8% of games
6.0mixed
40%
6W–9L · 48.4% of games
6.5mixed
42.9%
6W–8L · 48.4% of games
7.0mixed
33.3%
9W–18L · 43% of games
7.5mixed
0%
0W–5L · 20.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
64 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
52 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova