← Search

Jim Migel

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 121W–64L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jim Migel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
W
2026-08-06 · IN OUR PRIME · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Blaine Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Randy Elsethagen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-31 · #1 Doubles · with Gibby Lee championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-07-28 · IN OUR PRIME · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Blaine Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-26 · Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brad Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-06-23 · Morris Hall · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with John Stosich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-18 · Morris Hall · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darren Kuhn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-04 · Morris Hall · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Colby Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-21 · Morris Hall · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gibby Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-05-20 · Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0M · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Boozer Jr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-12 · Morris Hall · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gibby Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
L
2026-05-11 · Idaho/Boozer/55&Over6.0M · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Brad Anderson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 52.1% of games
3.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 54.8% of games
6.0
70.5%
31W–13L · 57.9% of games
7.0
73.9%
17W–6L · 61.1% of games
0.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
87.1%
27W–4L · 61.7% of games
6.5mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 61.3% of games
7.0mixed
55.6%
15W–12L · 50.4% of games
7.5mixed
25%
2W–6L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
67 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
59 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
57 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams