← Search

Brett Carlsen

Pocatello, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
246 matches · 87W–159L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Brett Carlsen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history246 matches
L
2026-08-04 · Shawn Oram · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pat Gates
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-30 · Shawn Oram · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Fullmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-21 · Shawn Oram · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Lynn
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-07 · Shawn Oram · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Bill Fullmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · Old School Spin* · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bill Fullmer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-16 · No Strings · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Oram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-06-12 · No Strings · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shawn Oram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-26 · No Strings · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ali Habashi
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-26 · Old School Spin* · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with James DiSanza
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-21 · No Strings · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Andrew Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-05-21 · Old School Spin* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Joe Andersen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-12 · Old School Spin* · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Andrew Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
0.0
48.5%
16W–17L · 48.6% of games
3.5
41.1%
23W–33L · 47.8% of games
4.0
21.4%
3W–11L · 42.1% of games
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
42.9%
9W–12L · 50.4% of games
8.0
0%
0W–6L · 21.7% of games
6.5mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.6% of games
7.0mixed
25.8%
16W–46L · 40.7% of games
7.5mixed
25%
4W–12L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 51% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 28% of the time
#2 Doubles
28%
70 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
61 matches
#1 Singles
24%
59 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
47 matches
#2 Singles
4%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer