← Search

Kent Waddoups

Shelley, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
230 matches · 68W–162L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kent Waddoups to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history230 matches
L
2026-08-31 · Mixed Berries · #3 Doubles · 5.5 · with Jammie Saxton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-26 · Mixed Berries · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debbie Vande Kamp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-19 · Mixed Berries · #2 Doubles · 5.5 · with Debbie Vande Kamp mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-17 · Mixed Berries · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Laura Ivie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · Wilson & Gordon · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Walt Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Wilson & Gordon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Walt Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-21 · Wilson & Gordon · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Reuben Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · Idaho/Wilson/55&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Patrick Trimp
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-18 · BEWARE STINGING B's · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Roger Atkinson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · BEWARE STINGING B's · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Quinton Owens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-02 · BEWARE STINGING B's · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Facer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-01 · Idaho/Wilson/55&Over6.0M · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Walt Wood
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
34.4%
22W–42L · 44.6% of games
6.0
37.2%
16W–27L · 41.9% of games
7.0
8.3%
1W–11L · 17.5% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
2.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 51.3% of games
5.5mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 47.6% of games
6.0mixed
20%
12W–48L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–5L · 23.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
105 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
80 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
41 matches
#1 Singles
1%
2 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer