← Search

Charles Stuart

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
69 matches · 42W–27L · seasons 2025–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.95
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 19 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
74%
stay 3.0
26%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 93% stay · 7% up, from a year-end estimate of 2.88. Lower than today’s 2.95 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 3.0
27 of 51
ID · 3.0
123 of 240
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Charles is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Charles has been a steady 3.0 across all 2 seasons on record.

2.53.020252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Charles has gone from the 84th to the 93rd percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.0
86.7%
13W–2L · 63.9% of games
6.0
40%
4W–6L · 57.2% of games
5.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 71.4% of games
6.0mixed
50%
6W–6L · 56.3% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Jeremy Westwood
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 36% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Drew Keller
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-07-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with David Eisenreich
+0.004about as expected — took 56% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 7-6
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Robert Leong
−0.009about as expected — took 62% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 7-5
W
Quinton Owens / Kent Waddoups
2026-06-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Drew Keller
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-3
L
Walt Wood / Mark Peterson
2026-06-15 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ron Clayton
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Neil Marion
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 7-6
W
Boyd Southwick / Brent Cline
2026-06-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Karl Hearne
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 7-6
W
Kent Waddoups / Walt Wood
2026-06-01 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Bob Rogers
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-05-12 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jeremy Westwood
+0.010better than expected — took 80% of games against 67% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Holger Nickel / Mark Peterson
2026-05-11 · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Eric Anderson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
Jennifer Jennings / Joshua Newellmixed
2026-04-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cyndy Boorman
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.