Teams

ONLY HALF OLD

2026 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Men 3.0 - 40 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.95 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-05vs Match Points & IbuprofenWon 40
W#1 DoublesRichard Sharp / Vincent Mcroberts vs Karl Hearne / Michael Shurtliff6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDustin Mortimer vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesEric Anderson / Daniel Leach vs Steve Warner / Patrick Trimp6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRon Clayton / Neil Marion vs Tim Mcmahon / Blaine Johnson6-2, 6-3
2026-07-29vs Trent FowersWon 31
W#1 DoublesTravis Barber / Robert Leong vs Max Taylor / Ryan Anderson7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesRichard Sharp vs Boyd Southwick6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRon Clayton / Neil Marion vs Trent Fowers / Rod Gilstrap6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesBob Boozer Jr / David Eisenreich vs Flint Packer / Mark Taylor6-7, 5-7
2026-07-15vs Match Points & IbuprofenWon 40
W#1 DoublesRon Clayton / Daniel Leach vs Michael Shurtliff / Patrick Trimp6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDustin Mortimer vs Steve Warner6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesDavid Eisenreich / Charles Stuart vs Drew Facer / Karl Hearne7-5, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRichard Sharp / Travis Barber vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-07-13vs Trent FowersWon 31
W#1 DoublesCharles Stuart / Robert Leong vs Ryan Anderson / Flint Packer6-3, 7-5
L#1 SinglesNeil Marion vs Skyleur Steffensen6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesEric Anderson / Ron Clayton vs Morris Hall / Mark Taylor6-4, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTravis Barber / Bob Boozer Jr vs Max Taylor / Brad Vande Kamp6-1, 6-0
2026-07-06vs Match Points & IbuprofenWon 40
W#1 DoublesTravis Barber / Daniel Leach vs Jeremy Westwood / Steve Warner7-5, 6-2
W#1 SinglesNeil Marion vs Michael Shurtliff6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesBob Boozer Jr / David Eisenreich vs Ryan Eastman / Blaine Johnson7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEric Anderson / Vincent Mcroberts vs Drew Facer / Karl Hearne6-1, 6-2
2026-07-01vs Trent FowersSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBob Boozer Jr / Eric Anderson vs Klay Johnson / Skyleur Steffensen6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesRobert Leong vs Ryan Anderson1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesNeil Marion / Richard Sharp vs Flint Packer / Mark Taylor6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRon Clayton / David Eisenreich vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1ONLY HALF OLD6020411141
2Trent Fowers24131126230
3Match Points & Ibuprofen1532142265

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Vincent Mcroberts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.05
Robert Leong
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.99
Travis Barber
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.99
Ron Clayton
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.99
Dustin Mortimer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.99
Neil Marion
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published 3
2.94
Richard Sharp
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.86
Charles Stuart
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.84
Daniel Leach
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.58
David Eisenreich
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.24
Bob Boozer Jr
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ron Clayton + Daniel Leach8552% games−3.7% vs expected
Bob Boozer Jr + Travis Barber4262% gamesnot enough data
Ron Clayton + Charles Stuart3258% gamesnot enough data
Ron Clayton + Bob Boozer Jr134 matchesnot enough data
Ron Clayton + Neil Marion213 matchesnot enough data
Bob Boozer Jr + David Eisenreich213 matchesnot enough data
Robert Leong + Dustin Mortimer213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Vincent Mcroberts
4W–1L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.07
3
Robert Leong
83W–88L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
3.05
3
Travis Barber
119W–78L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%52%48%
2.99
3
Ron Clayton
79W–79L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Dustin Mortimer
65W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%53%47%
2.99
3
Neil Marion
105W–114L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Richard Sharp
4W–0L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%65%34%
2.94
3
Charles Stuart
49W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
3
Daniel Leach
25W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
2.84
3
David Eisenreich
19W–29L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
2.58
2.5
Bob Boozer Jr
133W–230L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.