← Search

Jason Steele

BOISE, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
246 matches · 134W–112L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jason Steele to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history246 matches
W
2026-08-15 · #3 Doubles · with Leann Gilberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-08-14 · #2 Doubles · with Leann Gilberg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Shawna Byington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-7
L
2026-07-28 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leann Gilberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Leann Gilberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with David Roberts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Ira Fagin championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-23 · Racket Posse 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Warwick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-19 · Racket Posse 18+ · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Mertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-11 · Racket Posse 18+ · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Roberts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-06-09 · Racket Posse 18+ · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with James Mertz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-11 · Racket Posse · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Micah Vogt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
78%
32W–9L · 63.9% of games
4.0
44.2%
19W–24L · 46.2% of games
7.0mixed
45.3%
29W–35L · 50.6% of games
7.5mixed
47.1%
16W–18L · 48.8% of games
8.0mixed
57.9%
22W–16L · 50% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 37% of the time
#3 Doubles
37%
92 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
75 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
75 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer