← Search

Amy Wendel

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
228 matches · 152W–76L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amy Wendel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history228 matches
L
2026-09-10 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Melanie Mitchell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-09-08 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Katie Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
W
Brian Johnson / Kiley Holt
2026-08-26 · Loose Strings · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-08-10 · Loose Strings · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Payton Kinler / Jolein Harro
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Hailey Smith championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
Travis Azous / Kathleen Chamberlain
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Brittney Lacey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
Lynette Wills / Bessy Nielson
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Michele Inghram championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bob Haycock mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Brittney Lacey championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Katie Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Nancy Mallory championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-14 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Micah Vogt mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams40 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
87.5%
7W–1L · 62.9% of games
3.0
74.2%
23W–8L · 59.8% of games
3.5
70.2%
40W–17L · 57.2% of games
4.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 47.1% of games
7.0
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 51% of games
7.0mixed
77.1%
27W–8L · 60.9% of games
7.5mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 52.1% of games
8.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 53% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
101 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
46 matches
#1 Singles
7%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer