← Search

Michele Inghram

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
268 matches · 148W–120L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michele Inghram to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history268 matches
L
Beth Lassen / Kathy Scribner
2026-09-10 · Slice & Dice · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kristen Boyd
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-09-09 · Slice & Dice · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Katherine Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-20 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-08-18 · Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · Loose Strings · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Steven Garcia mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-08-11 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · Loose Strings · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Boyington mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Doubles · with Susan Riley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Doubles · with Kimberlee Megale championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
Lynette Wills / Bessy Nielson
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Amy Wendel championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janet Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
Jackie Fuller / Tamara Gardner
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Mardianne Howell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.5
71.2%
57W–23L · 57.9% of games
4.0
16.3%
8W–41L · 37.6% of games
6.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
78.9%
30W–8L · 61.5% of games
8.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.1% of games
6.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.1% of games
7.0mixed
69%
20W–9L · 56.2% of games
7.5mixed
36.8%
7W–12L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
96 matches
#3 Doubles
31%
83 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
79 matches
#2 Singles
2%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King