← Search

Janet Wilson

Nampa, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
280 matches · 151W–129L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Janet Wilson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history280 matches
L
2026-08-27 · Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Teresa McDonald
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-08-26 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Trang Pham
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-20 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Inghram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-13 · Tie Breakers · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ellen Kennedy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-08-11 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Inghram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-08-06 · Tie Breakers · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sherry Hamilton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Tie Breakers · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michele Inghram
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Tina Measham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Tina Measham championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Merritt Swartley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-02 · Hot Flashes · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Hot Flashes · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathy Christensen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams43 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.5
66.7%
6W–3L · 54.8% of games
4.0
56.9%
58W–44L · 52.4% of games
4.5
31.8%
7W–15L · 42.6% of games
7.0
42.9%
6W–8L · 49.6% of games
8.0
59.2%
42W–29L · 54.1% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 30.4% of games
7.5mixed
80%
8W–2L · 59.2% of games
8.0mixed
52.6%
10W–9L · 50.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
102 matches
#3 Doubles
34%
95 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
81 matches
#1 Singles
0%
1 match
#2 Singles
0%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams