← Search

Lora Bonser

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
227 matches · 117W–110L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Lora Bonser to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history227 matches
L
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Rebecca Fitzpatrick championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Dawn Collias championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Lori Hosac championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Shady Ladies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rebecca Fitzpatrick
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-23 · Vintage Volleys · #3 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-06-18 · Vintage Volleys · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Debra Purdy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-06-16 · Vintage Volleys · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-11 · Vintage Volleys · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Elizabeth Schneider
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · Shady Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Michelle Johnston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-04 · SLAY! · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-29 · SLAY! · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Hosac
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · SLAY! · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suzie Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams48 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
78.8%
41W–11L · 62.9% of games
3.5
33.3%
13W–26L · 43.6% of games
6.0
70%
14W–6L · 59.6% of games
7.0
39.5%
15W–23L · 47.9% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 55.2% of games
6.5mixed
50%
4W–4L · 52.6% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 35.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 43% of the time
#3 Doubles
43%
97 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
69 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
55 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe