← Search

Amy Getz

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 45W–41L · seasons 2020–2026

Captains: add Amy Getz to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-08-01 · #2 Doubles · with Kimberly Prohaska championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · #3 Doubles · with Stacey Novak championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Valencia Bilyeu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-30 · Bend & Snap! · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Laurie Nowierski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-29 · Serving Up Sass · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Beckmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jennifer Boyd / Colleen Trese
2026-06-23 · Bend & Snap! · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jodi Whittaker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Bend & Snap! · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle McSorley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-06-15 · Serving Up Sass · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Emily Beckmann
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-05-18 · Serving Up Sass · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amy Pugsley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · Kick Your Aces · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michael Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-04 · Serve-ivors · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michelle McSorley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-04-27 · Serve-ivors · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Valencia Bilyeu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
53.2%
25W–22L · 53.1% of games
3.5
33.3%
2W–4L · 42.6% of games
6.0
72.7%
8W–3L · 61.7% of games
7.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
5.5mixed
50%
3W–3L · 56.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.2% of games
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#1 Singles
5%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe