← Search

Amy Pugsley

Boise, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
128 matches · 82W–46L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Amy Pugsley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history128 matches
W
2026-07-22 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fred Costello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Morgan White championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Farrell Kessler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Morgan White championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-0
W
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Fred Costello mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · Vintage Volleys · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Lorinda Harris
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-29 · Serving Up Sass · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Farrell Kessler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · Vintage Volleys · #1 Doubles · 6.0 · with Ruth Adler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · Shady Ladies · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Paige Gustavsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-23 · SLAY! · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Costello
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-22 · Serving Up Sass · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Angela Little
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-06-03 · Serving Up Sass · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Morgan White
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
68.4%
13W–6L · 64.5% of games
3.0
82.5%
33W–7L · 62.7% of games
3.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 41.4% of games
6.0
64.3%
9W–5L · 54.7% of games
7.0
60%
3W–2L · 52.2% of games
5.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 58.6% of games
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 54.7% of games
6.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 57.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 35% of the time
#1 Doubles
35%
45 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
34 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#1 Singles
10%
13 matches
#2 Singles
6%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe