← Search

Connie Maughan

Twin Falls, ID
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
130 matches · 53W–77L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Connie Maughan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-09-04 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Whitney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-09-02 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Catherine Daily
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-27 · Net Assets · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jeff Poulsen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 1-6
L
2026-08-26 · Double Trouble · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kay Higer
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-21 · Double Trouble · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lana Penrose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-07 · Double Trouble · #3 Doubles · 0.0 · with Elizabeth Lassen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · with Judy Graf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Janet Roe championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Judy Graf championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-06 · Twin Sisters · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Amy Bearden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-06-29 · Twin Sisters · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Lassen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nancy Silva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
0.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.2% of games
3.0
100%
5W–0L · 65.2% of games
3.5
42.5%
17W–23L · 48.1% of games
7.0
39.4%
13W–20L · 45% of games
6.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
66.7%
10W–5L · 61.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
50 matches
#1 Doubles
31%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
39 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer