Teams

Net Assets

2026 ITA Mixed Doubles · ITA 6.5 Mixed Doubles League

8 players · average NTRP 3.10 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-27vs Magic VolleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesBrian Smith / Samantha Bertomen vs Rachel Sandersfeld / Benanthony De La Rosa2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJudy Graf / Rosber Nieves vs Jim Opie / Jennifer Vargo6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesJeff Poulsen / Connie Maughan vs Jeff McCall / Kelcie Dickerson5-7, 1-6
2026-08-20vs Magic VolleyWon 21
L#1 DoublesRosber Nieves / April O'Berg vs Benanthony De La Rosa / Rachel Sandersfeld0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesDylan Bruce / Judy Graf vs Jeff McCall / Jamie King2-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrian Smith / Elizabeth Lassen vs Jim Opie / Kelcie Dickerson6-4, 6-1
2026-08-18vs MV Under LobsWon 21
W#1 DoublesDylan Bruce / Samantha Bertomen vs Michael Zigich / Jena Clayville6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesDavid Miller / Judy Graf vs Roy Prescott / Jordan Head2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBrian Smith / Elizabeth Lassen vs Randall Largent / Evelyn Perez6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for ITA 6.5 Mixed Doubles League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Brian Smith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.07
Samantha Bertomen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Judy Graf
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Elizabeth Lassen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Connie Maughan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
April O'Berg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Dylan Bruce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rosber Nieves
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dylan Bruce + Samantha Bertomen314 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Lassen + Brian Smith314 matchesnot enough data
Judy Graf + Rosber Nieves303 matchesnot enough data
Judy Graf + Brian Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Brian Smith
19W–35L career · type M · 3 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Samantha Bertomen
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Judy Graf
82W–67L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Elizabeth Lassen
35W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
3
Connie Maughan
53W–75L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
April O'Berg
0W–14L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
23%77%<1%
2.60
Dylan Bruce
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Rosber Nieves
7W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.