Teams

MV Under Lobs

2026 ITA Mixed Doubles · ITA 6.5 Mixed Doubles League

10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-08-25vs Magic VolleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesJordan Head / Michael Zigich vs Nicole Rowley / Benanthony De La Rosa3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJena Clayville / Roy Prescott vs Jennifer Vargo / John Shuss6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesCaroline Eggerth / Michael Sato vs Kelcie Dickerson / Jeff McCall2-6, 1-6
2026-08-18vs Net AssetsLost 12
L#1 DoublesMichael Zigich / Jena Clayville vs Dylan Bruce / Samantha Bertomen2-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRoy Prescott / Jordan Head vs David Miller / Judy Graf6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesRandall Largent / Evelyn Perez vs Brian Smith / Elizabeth Lassen3-6, 3-6
2026-08-11vs Magic VolleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesEvelyn Perez / Michael Sato vs Benanthony De La Rosa / Nicole Rowley2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGreg Chylewski / Caroline Eggerth vs Rachel Sandersfeld / Jeff McCall0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesMichael Zigich / Melissa Lewis vs Jim Opie / Jennifer Vargo7-5, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · ITA 6.5 Mixed Doubles League
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Magic Volley1021219
2MV Under Lobs0224862

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Greg Chylewski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Randall Largent
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Michael Sato
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.17
Jena Clayville
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Melissa Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.87
Evelyn Perez
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.77
Roy Prescott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Michael Zigich
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.62
Caroline Eggerth
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jordan Head
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Greg Chylewski + Melissa Lewis1540% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Greg Chylewski
15W–35L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Randall Largent
19W–21L career · type M · 1 line in 2026
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Michael Sato
6W–19L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Jena Clayville
34W–33L career · 2 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
3.17
3.5
Melissa Lewis
23W–31L career · 1 line in 2026
75%25%<1%
2.91
Evelyn Perez
3W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Roy Prescott
11W–16L career · type M · 2 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Michael Zigich
5W–16L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
2.74
3
Caroline Eggerth
0W–7L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
2.62
Jordan Head
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.