← Search

Jena Clayville

Twin Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
63 matches · 32W–31L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.20
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Twin Falls · 3.5
8 of 8
ID · 3.5
254 of 289
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Jena is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jena has played at 3.5, 4.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.03.54.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Jena has gone from the 88th to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.5
63.3%
19W–11L · 57.4% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 40.5% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 57.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
Randall Largent / Jamie Kingmixed
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Miller
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Annette Barnum / Anne Elise Hertl
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie King
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-28 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Keck
+0.000better than expected — took 61% of games against 45% expected
6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-23 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Keck
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
Annette Barnum / Anne Elise Hertl
2026-07-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelcie Dickerson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
L
Jamie King / Randall Largentmixed
2026-07-21 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Miller
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-07-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Keck
+0.000better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Jamie LaMure / Melissa Lewis
2026-05-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Sandersfeld
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
W
Annette Barnum / Cathy Cooper
2026-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie King
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-1
W
Elizabeth Karel / Greg Chylewskimixed
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Smith
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Melissa Lewis / David Millermixed
2026-05-07 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Richard Keck
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
L
Benanthony De La Rosa / Rachel Sandersfeldmixed
2026-04-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Brian Smith
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.