← Search

Nancy Silva

Gooding, ID
3.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
83 matches · 39W–44L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nancy Silva to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history83 matches
W
2026-09-04 · Racquet Scientists · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kim Ward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-09-02 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette Barnum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-08-28 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cathy Cooper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W
Cynthia Levings / Kay Higer
2026-08-21 · Racquet Scientists · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Annette Barnum
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-12 · Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-08-07 · Racquet Scientists · #1 Doubles · 0.0 · with Molly Arrossa
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Kari Brose championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Kari Brose championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-6
L
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Annette Barnum championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-29 · Set2Win · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Judy Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-07-06 · Go-netters · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Judy Graf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
0.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 61.3% of games
3.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 55.1% of games
7.0
48.8%
20W–21L · 49.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
29 matches
#1 Doubles
28%
23 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova