← Search

Monica Kuhn

Idaho Falls, ID
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
108 matches · 55W–53L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Monica Kuhn to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history108 matches
W
2026-09-03 · Smash Mix · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Straton Facer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-27 · Smash Mix · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Drew Facer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-19 · Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-08-18 · Smash Mix · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Drew Facer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-12 · Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-08-10 · Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Diane Poole
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-06 · Tawni Howell · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tera Craig
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-06 · Berry · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Brianne Stuart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Jennifer Crofts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-01 · #1 Doubles · with Jennifer Crofts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Crofts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-31 · #2 Doubles · with Jennifer Crofts championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
17.6%
3W–14L · 32% of games
3.0
67.7%
21W–10L · 58.7% of games
3.5
13.3%
2W–13L · 34% of games
6.0
84.6%
11W–2L · 66.5% of games
7.0
80%
8W–2L · 62.2% of games
6.0mixed
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.6% of games
6.5mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
32 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
28 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe