← Search

Margo Nef

rexburg, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 89W–70L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Margo Nef to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-08-06 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-07-23 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Collette Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-21 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lisa Wheeler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
Kristin Di Bona / Kimberly Wilson
2026-06-30 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lorraine Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-18 · Hulse · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Deborah Stosich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-06-16 · Hulse · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Gyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-06-09 · Hulse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Collette Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-28 · Hulse · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Collette Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-05-19 · Hulse · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Linda Zentner
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Jacqualyn Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-08-02 · #2 Doubles · with Jacqualyn Nelson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams25 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
0.0
75%
3W–1L · 57% of games
3.5
66.7%
42W–21L · 57.9% of games
4.0
30%
6W–14L · 40.7% of games
7.0
64%
16W–9L · 58.6% of games
8.0
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
45.5%
5W–6L · 46.2% of games
7.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
20%
31 matches
#1 Singles
4%
7 matches
#2 Singles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Champions keep playing until they get it right.
Billie Jean King