← Search

Jacqualyn Nelson

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
413 matches · 214W–199L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jacqualyn Nelson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history413 matches
W
2026-08-27 · TeAm BiGElOw · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jedediah Bigelow mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-08-19 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Holly Gyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-08-17 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lurline Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-10 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Holly Gyles
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-06 · Forty and Fabulous · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Collette Bott
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-06 · Berry · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Laura Kelley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-08-05 · Lloyd · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrianne Shirley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-08-05 · Berry · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lurline Berry
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-04 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adrianne Shirley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Karri Sloan / Heidi Dillard
2026-08-03 · Lloyd · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Adrianne Shirley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-02 · #3 Doubles · with Teresa Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-6
W
2026-08-01 · #3 Doubles · with Teresa Henderson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level12 levels played
0.0
60%
6W–4L · 47% of games
2.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5
62.5%
50W–30L · 56.4% of games
4.0
43.2%
41W–54L · 47.5% of games
7.0
62.5%
20W–12L · 60.9% of games
8.0
43.5%
10W–13L · 44.1% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
56.5%
13W–10L · 55.7% of games
7.0mixed
78.8%
26W–7L · 61.3% of games
7.5mixed
52%
13W–12L · 51.9% of games
8.0mixed
33.3%
6W–12L · 46.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 34% of the time
#2 Doubles
34%
139 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
118 matches
#3 Doubles
26%
109 matches
#1 Singles
8%
33 matches
#2 Singles
3%
14 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe