← Search

Rebecca Webb

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
69 matches · 39W–30L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.33
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 8 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Idaho Falls · 3.5
33 of 46
ID · 3.5
201 of 289
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Rebecca is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Rebecca has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Rebecca has gone from the 57th to the 80th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
57.1%
8W–6L · 55.9% of games
3.5
57.7%
15W–11L · 53.3% of games
4.0
50%
6W–6L · 50.7% of games
5.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history69 matches
W
2026-07-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Angie Sargent
+0.055better than expected — took 80% of games against 50% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-07-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Wood
−0.019below expectation — took 53% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-09 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Fullmer
+0.021better than expected — took 75% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Kate Miller / Natalie Piper
2026-06-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ronee Ross
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
Taralynn Sibbett
2026-06-10 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-4
L
Shelby Hanson / Lisa Wheeler
2026-06-08 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Wood
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-2
L
Avalon Russell / Lucy Anderson
2026-06-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Behrmann
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 7-5
W
Anna Colling / Michelle Marlowe
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Heather Davies
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-2
W
Rebecca Lanier / Collette Bott
2025-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ann Traynor
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-0, 6-0
L
2025-07-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lori Murdoch
+0.000about as expected — took 33% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2025-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ann Traynor
+0.030better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Rebecca Lanier / Holly Gyles
2025-06-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Wood
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.