← Search

Kim Bryan

Ammon, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
167 matches · 75W–92L · seasons 2021–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.64
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 36 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
4%
down to 3.5
96%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Ammon · 4.0
7 of 8
ID · 4.0
169 of 216
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Kim is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kim has been 4.0 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kim has gone from the 18th to the 88th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level7 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 48.3% of games
4.0
49.3%
35W–36L · 48.7% of games
4.5
23.1%
6W–20L · 40.3% of games
7.0mixed
54.5%
12W–10L · 50.6% of games
7.5mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 41.9% of games
8.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 52% of games
8.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history167 matches
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.057below expectation — took 57% of games against 75% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Cindy Biedebach / Tina Taylormixedchamps
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Lynda Fennern
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W
Priya Kanapartimixedchamps
2026-07-18 · #1 Singles
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 39% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Kariesa Lamphmixedchamps
2026-07-17 · #2 Singles
+0.000about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-07-15 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.014better than expected — took 54% of games against 48% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.005about as expected — took 67% of games against 64% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Hayley Hill
−0.006about as expected — took 43% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alexandra Chapman
−0.021about as expected — took 67% of games against 69% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-24 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jenell Lester
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-4
W
Melissa Millican / Melissa Brake
2026-06-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tiffany Zweifel
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Stephanie Ralston
+0.022better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-22 · #1 Singles · 4.0
−0.006about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.