← Search

Carmen Peters

Idaho Falls, ID
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
173 matches · 88W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Carmen Peters to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history173 matches
L
2026-08-25 · Hulse's Heroes · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Zac Dalton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Bob Boozer Jr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-15 · #2 Doubles · with Bob Boozer Jr championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-06 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Wheeler · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 0-6
L
Linda Orchard / Alison Dustin
2026-08-03 · Wheeler · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jessica Bare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L
Kristin Di Bona
2026-07-30 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-23 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 5-7
L
Sharon Duque / Linda Orchard
2026-07-22 · Wheeler · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Alissa Marodis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-20 · Wheeler · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-14 · Forty and Fabulous · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Thueson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-06-30 · Forty and Fabulous · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
3.0
64%
16W–9L · 58% of games
3.5
34.7%
17W–32L · 45.5% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 36.1% of games
5.5mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
77.3%
17W–5L · 59.2% of games
6.5mixed
64.5%
20W–11L · 54.7% of games
7.0mixed
47.4%
9W–10L · 50.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
48 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
33 matches
#1 Singles
17%
29 matches
#2 Singles
10%
18 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal