Teams

Causing A Racket

2026 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - IDAHO FALLS · Mixed 7.0 - MIXED 18 & OVER

12 players · average NTRP 3.38 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-02-27vs Hulse's HeroesWon 21
W#1 DoublesShellie Willardson / Dallin Felix vs Shelby Hanson / Zachary Hulse6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarmen Peters / Drew Keller vs Libby Cameron / Darren Kuhn5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKarri Sloan / Aram Sloan vs Rebecca Lanier / Jack Trimp6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-02-21vs 18+++Lost 03
L#1 DoublesShellie Willardson / Eric Anderson vs Daniel Peterson / Jacqualyn Nelson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesMonica Kuhn / Hunter Markowski vs Morris Hall / Cyndy Boorman3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCarmen Peters / Drew Keller vs Joshua Berry / Jessica Bare5-7, 3-6
2026-02-20vs Hard Court HustlersLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Crofts / Eric Anderson vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAngie Sargent / Drew Keller vs Holly Gyles / Neil Marion6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Shurtliff / Reese Shurtliff vs Kamarie Hearne / Evan Butterworth1-6, 3-6
2026-02-17vs MeikleLost 12
W#1 DoublesDallin Felix / Shellie Willardson vs Ryan Daw / Melanie Daw2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMonica Kuhn / Hunter Markowski vs Lindsey Stevens / Tyson Parker4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesEmily Shurtliff / Reese Shurtliff vs Mark Chambers / Katy Chambers2-6, 0-6
2026-02-09vs Hulse's HeroesLost 03
L#1 DoublesHunter Markowski / Monica Kuhn vs Stephanie Ralston / Jack Trimp3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCarmen Peters / Drew Keller vs Zachary Hulse / Amie Belnap3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesShellie Willardson / Aram Sloan vs Libby Cameron / Joe Belnap1-6, 1-6
2026-02-07vs 18+++Lost 03
L#1 DoublesAngie Sargent / Dallin Felix vs Colby Adams / Lisa Wheeler5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesEric Anderson / Jennifer Crofts vs Morris Hall / Cyndy Boorman4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesKarri Sloan / Aram Sloan vs Van Stosich / Jennifer Lloyd3-6, 7-6
2026-01-30vs Hard Court HustlersWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarmen Peters / Dallin Felix vs Kelly Harrison / Tyler Pearson6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJennifer Crofts / Eric Anderson vs Lisa Nelson / Joshua Stringam6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesEmily Shurtliff / Reese Shurtliff vs Holly Gyles / Evan Butterworth0-6, 1-6
2026-01-29vs MeikleLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Crofts / Eric Anderson vs Melanie Daw / Ryan Daw1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKarri Sloan / Aram Sloan vs Lindsey Stevens / Tyson Parker0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMonica Kuhn / Hunter Markowski vs Ronee Ross / Tim Ross2-6, 7-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Mixed 7.0 - MIXED 18 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
118+++6217720219
2Causing A Racket2661838260
3Hard Court Hustlers1771735240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Jennifer Crofts
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.66
Hunter Markowski
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.19
Shellie Willardson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Karri Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.11
Angie Sargent
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.06
Reese Shurtliff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Carmen Peters
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.89
Monica Kuhn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.87
Drew Keller
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.83
Aram Sloan
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dallin Felix
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Shurtliff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hunter Markowski + Monica Kuhn044 matchesnot enough data
Emily Shurtliff + Reese Shurtliff033 matchesnot enough data
Carmen Peters + Drew Keller033 matchesnot enough data
Karri Sloan + Aram Sloan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jennifer Crofts
71W–60L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
Hunter Markowski
4W–11L career · 7 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Shellie Willardson
32W–43L career · 4 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Karri Sloan
65W–70L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Angie Sargent
30W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
22%78%<1%
3.11
Reese Shurtliff
6W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Carmen Peters
88W–85L career · 4 lines in 2026
70%30%<1%
2.93
3
Monica Kuhn
53W–53L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Drew Keller
9W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%82%17%
2.87
3
Aram Sloan
5W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Dallin Felix
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Emily Shurtliff
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.