← Search

Cindy Biedebach

Boise, ID
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
120 matches · 54W–66L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Cindy Biedebach to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history120 matches
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Tina Taylor championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Ashley Tribble championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-29 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-10 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Taylor
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-5
L
2026-06-08 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Steckel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-03 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brette Shakespeare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-06-01 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brette Shakespeare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-05-27 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-18 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Hulsman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-07 · Shot Show DD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clarissa Cutler-Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2025-10-02 · Shot Show DD · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dana Gross
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-09-18 · Shot Show DD · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Clarissa Cutler-Evans
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
38.9%
7W–11L · 49.4% of games
4.0
41.5%
17W–24L · 46% of games
7.0
60%
9W–6L · 54% of games
8.0
75%
9W–3L · 60.9% of games
6.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.4% of games
7.5mixed
15.4%
2W–11L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 52% of the time
#3 Doubles
52%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
24%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert