← Search

Amy Steckel

Boise, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
239 matches · 117W–122L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Amy Steckel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history239 matches
W
Lori Ewing / Robin Azevedo
2026-09-10 · Simply Smashing Doubles · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Adriana Kurtz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-24 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Sauder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
L
2026-08-19 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Michael Warwick mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-10 · No Strings Attached · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Eric Sauder mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · with Suzanne Baran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · with Suzanne Baran championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-3
W
2026-07-02 · Penn Pals · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cathy Adams
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-24 · Serves You Right · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Janelle Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-17 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brette Shakespeare
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-10 · Serves You Right · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-09 · Penn Pals · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Barb Harper
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-08 · Serves You Right · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cindy Biedebach
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
58.7%
71W–50L · 53.8% of games
4.5
37.8%
14W–23L · 46% of games
8.0
40.8%
20W–29L · 49.6% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 26% of the time
#2 Doubles
26%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
55 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
51 matches
#1 Singles
19%
45 matches
#2 Singles
11%
26 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer